A STATEMENT IN OPPOSITION TO THE MINNESOTA MARRIAGE AMENDMENT

We, the undersigned, are members of the teaching faculty and staff of the College of Saint Benedict and Saint John’s University. We regard the proposed Minnesota Marriage Amendment on the November 6 ballot as an unjust attack on gay and lesbian people and at variance with our community’s best traditions and values.

We speak only for ourselves–not for any departments or institutions. We respect the neutral position on the amendment that the administrations of our two colleges have taken. They rightly encourage careful study of the issue, and so do we. We also respect the right of our students and other citizens to make their own informed choices on how to vote.

We speak as educators who have studied numerous aspects of same-sex marriage. The backers of the proposed amendment claim that a “No” vote will damage marriage, violate religious liberty, endanger children and generally lead to moral decline in society. We dispute such claims.

Current Minnesota law does not provide for same-sex marriage, and a “No” vote on the proposed amendment would not make same-sex marriage legal. A “No” vote would simply allow for a thoughtful public conversation about when and how to guarantee equal protection of the law to same-sex couples. A “Yes” vote will permanently make them second-class citizens. We believe this is wrong.

The proposed amendment is inconsistent with the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution, which states: “No state…shall deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.” Similarly, Minnesota’s constitution guarantees that “No member of this state shall be disenfranchised or deprived of any of the rights or privileges secured to any citizen thereof.” Though Minnesota law does not currently provide for same-sex marriage, the Minnesota Human Rights Act prohibits discrimination in housing and employment on the basis of sexual orientation. Passage of the proposed Marriage Amendment would be an ominous move in the opposite direction.

Both the First Amendment of the United States Constitution and the Minnesota Constitution guarantee religious liberty and separation of church and state. Laws permitting same-sex marriage would violate no one’s religious liberty. All churches would be free to perform or not perform marriages according to their own beliefs.

Differences in race or class were once taken as insurmountable obstacles to marriage, but today most people recognize that mutual love and respect are the foundations of married love. In 1967 the U.S. Supreme Court struck down laws prohibiting interracial marriage because such laws denied “equal protection of the laws” to interracial couples. We believe that laws banning same-sex marriage are essentially no different from laws that once banned interracial marriages.

Though the Catholic Bishops of Minnesota are calling on Catholics to vote “Yes,” there is, in fact, significant disagreement in the Catholic Church on same-sex marriage. Numerous theologians believe that the Bible cannot properly be invoked in support of a ban on same-sex marriage. Catholic faith defends the sanctity of individual conscience, and Catholics are not obligated to vote “Yes” on this amendment. Moreover, Catholic teaching alone cannot form the basis of civil law in a republic of many faiths and traditions.

According to the Second Vatican Council (1962-65), Catholic theologians must take into account “new sciences and theories,” so that “morality may keep pace with scientific knowledge.” It is in light of this guidance that many theologians have allowed insights of psychology and sociology to inform their theology, and they have concluded that homosexuality is natural, and that same-sex unions are compatible with Catholic faith. Indeed, theologians long ago argued that pastors might appropriately bless same-sex unions.

Quality empirical research has shown that children raised by same-sex couples have similar outcomes to children raised by heterosexual couples. The research has consistently demonstrated that children’s well-being is most directly related to the quality of parenting, not the gender or sexual orientation of the parents. Research has also shown that discriminatory laws and attitudes are harmful to same-sex families and their children. So, while advocates for passing the Marriage Amendment claim it is needed to protect families and children, it would likely have the opposite impact on many families.

In states of the USA and in countries around the world where same-sex unions and marriages are legal marriage has not been destroyed. Men and women continue to marry and (sadly) to be divorced at approximately the same rate as in states and countries where same-sex unions and marriages are not permitted. There is no evidence in these places that same-sex unions and marriages have caused any moral decline in society.

Gay men and lesbians have long been suffering the sting of discrimination. Suicide among homosexual teenagers occurs at an alarming rate. The good news is that more and more people are recognizing that homosexuality is like left-handedness–in the minority, but perfectly natural. As in the days of the civil rights movement for African Americans, Minnesota can again lead the country on a civil rights issue, this time by being the first state to reject this kind of discriminatory amendment. We urge the citizens of Minnesota to do so.

This is a paid political ad and does not reflect the views of The Record, the College of St. Benedict, and St. John’s University.

Stories

The McBurney-Soderlund Family

My name is Megan McBurney. I am a Minnesotan by birth and now, many years later, a Minnesotan by choice. I am lucky to have three incredible sisters who mean the world to me. Each of my sisters is married … Continue reading →

The Hermodson Family

Because of… A junior high friend, I learned the true meaning of trust and the important things that can happen when people trust you enough to tell you their deepest secrets; A pastor, my sister heard and pursued her own … Continue reading →

The Swanson-Ballinger Family

Our names are Javen Swanson and Oby Ballinger. Oby serves as pastor at Community United Church of Christ in St. Paul Park, and Javen is preparing for ordination in the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America. We strongly urge you to … Continue reading →

The Madison Family

Marriage means declaring – in front of your friends and family – that you are committing to sharing a life together. It means making a peaceful, loving, fair and inspiring home together. Marriage is sharing in your spouse’s disappointments, joys, … Continue reading →

The Yang Family

I am disheartened that in 2011, people are going to such great lengths to prevent gay couples from marriage: from forming legal, life-long commitments that would afford them the same health insurance, legal and tax benefits of their fellow married … Continue reading →

The Pfeifle-Weber Family

Ryan and I met on April 3, 1999. Four years later we decided to get married. On July 26, 2003 we had a ceremony in front of family and friends at the St. Paul Palace Theatre. Even though our marriage … Continue reading →

The Westerfield Family

We met working on a production of “Romeo and Juliet” in Albuquerque, New Mexico. We dated for a year, and then decided to commit to a permanent relationship. We did this in a park in Albuquerque in front of family, … Continue reading →

The Peterson Family

My name is Erin Peterson, and I want to share why I am opposed to the constitutional amendment that permanently bans marriage for same-sex couples. In 2005, I met my partner, Sheila, and in September this year, we will welcome … Continue reading →

The Hansen-Lovis Family

As I try to find words to express how deeply this amendment will affect my family I wonder what would it hurt to let me marry the woman whom I have been with for nine years, who gave birth to … Continue reading →

The Briem Family

We are your fellow Minnesotans. Your neighbors, your friends, your colleagues and your children’s classmates. As your fellow Minnesotans, my family deserves to be treated with the same level of dignity as your own family and every other Minnesotan. Unfortunately, … Continue reading →